What is this slop? The title would seem to imply that they survived because they're vintage (I.e. not plastic). In reality, the "article" is just a series of photos of old cars in front of burned out landscapes. Also, each caption is mostly the same wall of text. There's also no reporter or editorial credits, so this really reeks of AI generated disaster porn. At least the photographer was credited?
What is this slop? The title would seem to imply that they survived because they're vintage (I.e. not plastic). In reality, the "article" is just a series of photos of old cars in front of burned out landscapes. Also, each caption is mostly the same wall of text. There's also no reporter or editorial credits, so this really reeks of AI generated disaster porn. At least the photographer was credited?
It would make sense if were a lazy re-hosting of shots taken by a photographer deliberately cruising around.